Imagine that you're sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don't get any. So you say "I should get my fair share." And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, "everyone should get their fair share." Now, that's a wonderful sentiment -- indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad's smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn't solve the problem that you still haven't gotten any!Got it? Good. (h/t Anne Laurie at Ballon Juice)
The problem is that the statement "I should get my fair share" had an implicit "too" at the end: "I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else." But your dad's response treated your statement as though you meant "only I should get my fair share", which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that "everyone should get their fair share," while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out.
Blog-thing for Your Friendly Neighborhood Economist the alter-ego of Thomas Masterson
Friday, July 24, 2015
No, actually #BlackLivesMatter doesn't mean #WhiteLivesDon't
Jeb(!) Bush is certainly not the only one who doesn't get (or at least dare not be seen to get in public) the point of #BlackLivesMatter. If it confuses you or gives you awkward feels, try this analogy on for size (linked to in the WaPo blog post by Dave Weigel, but originally posted on Reddit):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment